Friday Five (reprise): Q&A with Steve Jones, ‘Brand Like A Rock Star’

Brand Like A Rock Star

While I wait for the good folks at EduBlogs to send me the files from the previous version of Higher Ed Marketing, I thought I’d share this blast from the recent past: An interview with Steve Jones, author of Brand Like A Rock Star: Lessons From Rock’n’Roll to Make Your Business Famous.

Of all the branding, marketing and PR books I’ve read in 2012 (which, admittedly, is only a few), Brand Like A Rock Star is my favorite by far. And not just because it combines two of my passions — branding and rock’n’roll — but also because of Jones’ straightforward writing style, knack for storytelling and ability to draw lessons from the realm of music to the world of marketing. I highly recommend this book for any lover of marketing, branding and rock’n’roll. You can also follow Steve’s doings on his website, blog and on Twitter (@rockstarbrands). And for Kindle users, Amazon now offers Brand Like A Rock Star: The Musical Companion, a free chapter-by-chapter playlist.

1. You share a name with the Sex Pistols’ guitarist. Did your parents name you after that Steve Jones, or is that just a happy coincidence?

I would love to think that my parents musical tastes were that progressive, but that simply wouldn’t be true! I was also born in 1970, a few years before the Sex Pistols’ rise to fame. But even if I had been born at the height of the Sex Pistols’ fame, I doubt my parents would have known who Steve was. Their tastes were much more folk-oriented. Frankly, I am surprised I wasn’t named after Gordon Lightfoot or Roger Whittaker or someone like that!

2. What inspired you to write this book?

I’ve always been very interested in the human decision making process, and over the course of my 27 years in the radio industry I’ve studied it a great deal. Why does a listener choose one radio station over another, even though both are playing essentially the same songs? It comes down to branding. It comes down to an expectation. Fast forward a few years, and I was sitting on a patio sipping a beer and listening to Jimmy Buffett and the thought crossed my mind that he had built up an incredible brand using only one hit song, “Margaritaville”. I began to think about other rock stars hat did the same thing, like the Grateful Dead. And the concept was born! I immediately reserved the URL “Brand Like A Rock Star” and started blogging about the lessons that business can learn from rock and roll. Over the course of two years of blogging, the book evolved rather organically from there.

3. Of all the branding lessons in your book, which one do you think is the most important for marketers (of any or all sectors) to heed? And why?

KISS proved it: "Different beats better"
KISS proved that “different beats better”

There are two really. One is “Sell The Experience” and the other is “Different Beats Better.” The “experience” concept is simple: Stop selling/marketing/promoting the products you sell, and start talking about the experience that customers have when they interact with you. Great brands spend most of their marketing time (and money) talking about the experience. Think about Apple. Very, very seldom do you see Apple ads that talk about price points or even product features. They are masterful at marketing the experience. My favorite example is the iPhone ad that uses two deaf people communicating via Facetime. Very powerful.

The “Different” concept is equally simple, yet seems to evade so many businesses. KISS proved it: You don’t need to strive to be dramatically better than the existing leader, you need to demonstrate that you are dramatically different. After all, what constitutes “better” differs from person to person. We all have our own view of what a “better” product looks like. But most of us can agree on what is “different.”

KISS was different when they came along, and you couldn’t help but to notice them. Lady Gaga does that today. You can’t avoid her. Are KISS and Lady Gaga the best examples of musical genius in our time? Probably not, to be fair. They are talented, but are they better than everyone else? On the other hand, nobody can dispute that they were both dramatically different.

4. Which takeaway from Brand Like a Rock Star do you think is most applicable to higher education?

Avoid trying to be all things to all people, and build a brand that someone will hate.

I think the higher education institutions that position themselves as “general” are becoming invisible, just like any business that attempts to please everyone eventually does. The schools (and brands) of the future that stand the best chance of success are the ones that stand for something. And when you stand for something, you are going to inevitably have people who dislike what you stand for. Accept that. In fact, celebrate it! If I’m a history buff, I am probably not going to choose MIT. Yet there is no doubt that I probably have an opinion on MIT and an understanding of what they are all about.

So what is it that you do that is special and unique? What do you specialize in? What makes you different than everyone else? Find those answers and use them to build your reputation.

5. When you think of the most recognizable brands in higher education (i.e., the most recognizable colleges and universities), what comes to mind? And to which rock stars would you compare those brands?

That’s a cool question, and not an easy one to answer. I think the higher education brands that come to mind are the schools that stand for something, as I mentioned above.

If you wanted to draw some parallels between rock stars and recognizable colleges and universities, you could look to certain qualities and values. For example, Ivy League schools like Harvard and Yale are like Bruce Springsteen — almost royal in their nature, among the very first to ever exist, and likely to maintain their legendary status for many years to come. Liberal schools like Williams College, Amherst, or Claremont are the Bob Dylans of education, leaning heavily on issues, rigorously academic but socially inclusive, and often progressive in their thinking. Schools like MIT and Stanford are like Rush: Very nerdy, extremely intelligent, and uniquely and wonderfully complicated.

Although it is superficial, it is a fun way to look at brands — education or otherwise — and bands.

Bonus question (you know I have to ask this): What are the five albums you would take with you if you were stranded on a desert island?

In no particular order… and with “greatest hits” albums excluded…

  • Exodus/Bob Marley
  • Nevermind/Nirvana
  • Born To Run/Bruce Springsteen
  • Revolver/Beatles
  • London Calling/The Clash

Book review: Zen and the art of presentations

Presentation Zen (Second Edition)

The Art of the Pitch

Lately I’ve noticed a lot of conversations about upcoming higher ed conferences floating along my Twitter stream. A lot of folks are also talking about submitting their proposals to present at those conferences.

In this post, I review two recently published books that can help you become a better presenter. (Actually, one of the books is a second edition, originally published in 2008.)

This information may come too late to help you with your proposal submissions (as you’ll read below, even submissions to present at a conference are presentations). But maybe it will encourage you to think differently about your next conference presentation. Or if you work on one of those campuses with tight purse strings and won’t be going to any conferences in the near future, maybe this information will help you with other presentation opportunities around campus or in your community.

How to avoid this (photo from learningcycle.ca)
How to avoid this (photo from learningcycle.ca)

If nothing else, maybe this post will help you avoid a horrible death-by-PowerPoint presentation. (But if you’re really worried about that, you should read Eric Stoller’s brilliant post on Inside Higher Ed, Conference Sessions Do Not Have To Suck, and his recent addendum to that post.)

Pres_Zen_2ndEdSince publication of the first edition in 2008, Presentation Zen, by Garr Reynolds, has become required reading for anyone who wants to improve their visual presentation skills — in boardrooms, classrooms or conference rooms. So is Reynolds’ Presentation Zen blog. Many of you have probably read the book and also read the blog from time to time. I’m embarrassed to say that I never read Reynolds’ book until the revised, updated second edition came out earlier this year. I didn’t know a revised edition was coming out until I read about it on Reynolds’ blog.

The second edition’s focus remains consistent with that of the original book — the importance of simplicity in PowerPoint presentations (“zen” in the book refers more to the artistry of a Japanese zen garden than the Buddhist philosophy) and the power of storytelling and compelling visuals. Consistent with those themes, Presentation Zen is simply and beautifully presented in words and pictures. And the storytelling element is there. Reynolds enlists the help of many big names in marketing to help tell the story — Guy Kawasaki writes (actually, he presents) the forward to the book, and Seth Godin shares a short essay on pages 20-21 about the importance of evoking emotion — and shares examples of presentations delivered by speakers, educators, technology experts and others.

Presentation Zen is an enjoyable, quick read, and a book you can return to over and over for reference or inspiration. The principles presented in this book can be applied to other situations besides presentations.

How does the new edition differ from the original? It’s bigger — with about 70 pages of additional content — and, if you purchase the exclusive Barnes & Noble edition, you also get a DVD video of Reynolds serenely discussing the Presentation Zen ideas. The video is a nice addition, and if you’ve had a harried day, it’s a nice way to unwind and refocus. But if you already own the first edition, it probably wouldn’t be worth the $30 bookstore price (or $18.98 on Amazon) to buy the second edition.

* * *

artofpitchWhile Presentation Zen focuses on crafting an artful approach to creating presentations, another book that came out this year, The Art of the Pitch, looks at the idea of “presentation” through a broader lens.

The Art of the Pitch is by Peter Coughter, a veteran advertising guy. As an ad man, he’s presented all manner of pitches for business to all manner of potential clients. So his perspective differs from Reynolds’ — and is in fact more philosophy than art in the visual sense. (Maybe the titles of these books should be altered to Presentation Art and The Zen of the Pitch.)

Like Reynolds, Coughter is a masterful storyteller. His book is filled with anecdotes about pitches won and lost — miniature case studies of what to do and what not to do when trying to win business, persuade others or simply present information.

Coughter’s book is not at all like Reynolds’s. The Art of the Pitch doesn’t discuss visuals until page 55, whereas Presentation Zen dives right in to that aspect of presenting.

Rather, Coughter’s emphasis is that every conversation, every business transaction, is a presentation. Or should be. Even your submission to present at a conference could be viewed as a presentation.

“Great work has to be sold,” he says (page 75). It’s not enough to simply do great work and expect it to win on its own merits.

Coughter peppers his book with a bit of Zen philosophy too. Like Reynolds, he believes in the merits of simplicity and restraint. On page 36, Coughter quotes a Zen proverb:

Make a choice about what’s important and let everything else go.

That’s an approach Garr Reynolds would also embrace, I’m sure.

Perhaps Reynolds might also embrace another quote from Coughter’s book: One attributed to British writer Sake (H.H. Munro) and a favorite aphorism of “legendary San Francisco ad man” Howard Gossage (whom I’ve never heard of):

When baiting a mousetrap with cheese, be sure to leave room for the mouse.

That gets back to The Art of the Pitch‘s greatest takeaway: Many of us are in the business of presenting — of trying to persuade. We could learn a lot from Coughter’s ideas, not just for conferences and PowerPoints, but also for meetings with the boss or dinner-party conversations.

If there’s one thing I don’t like about The Art of the Pitch, it’s the few occasions when Coughter slips into the old-fashioned, cigar-chomping, ad-guy writing style. This doesn’t happen often, but there are times.

While his tales of ad accounts won and lost would be fascinating cautionary tales to any student of advertising, PR or marketing, he sometimes comes off as a hypester. For instance, if Howard Gossage is really such a “legendary” ad man, would Coughter have to use that phrase to describe Gossage?

The same goes with the book-jacket description of Coughter as a professor at “the prestigious VCU Brandcenter at Virginia Commonwealth University.” Come on. If the VCU Brandcenter is really prestigious, do you have to call attention to that fact?

Perhaps Coughter could have used just a bit more restraint in his writing.

P.S. – For another perspective on both of these books, I recommend Karine Joly‘s reviews from her 1-1-1 Express Book Review series: