Content strategy is fine, but…

Photo via Bob Warfield's SmoothSpan blog
Photo via Bob Warfield’s SmoothSpan blog

I’m grateful to see the higher ed world talking so much about content strategy these days. This emphasis on thinking about content in a way that connects it with our organizational goals is important.

I’m glad that people are writing books and blogs about content strategy, too. And talking about this subject on Twitter. And planning entire conferences around the theme. These are important efforts, and I learn a lot from the content strategists I follow on Twitter and from their blog posts. I’ve learned valuable lessons that I’ve incorporated into my everyday work, and I’m thinking more about the importance of content in context.

But I sometimes wonder if we’re focusing too much on the content side of things.

I sometimes wonder if we need to pay more attention to the content needs or wants of the people we’re supposed to be creating our content for.

In other words, our audience.

The way content strategy is sometimes talked about, it reminds me of supply-side economics. In a way, I suppose it is. As technology has lowered the barriers to creating and distributing all sorts of content, consumers of that content have more than enough options at a very low price point.

But content strategy without regard to audience is misguided. Simply flooding the marketplace of ideas with more content won’t achieve many business goals for any organization.

Entrepreneur and blogger Bob Warfield touched on this in a post last December. “A lot of entrepreneurs,  when faced with the question, ‘What’s the most important thing to do first?’, would answer, ‘Build a product,” Warfield writes. “Big mistake.”

The most important thing to do first is to find an audience.  It may be that building a product is an integral part of growing your audience, but you’re not ready to build a product or grow your audience until you’ve found the right audience to start with.

Audience strategy, anyone?

I haven’t heard the term “audience strategy” bandied about much in the higher ed or marketing circles. But maybe someone should latch on to that idea and run with it.

Maybe it’s because we take our audiences for granted in higher ed. We’re not the entrepreneurs Bob Warfield is talking to. And while we do roll out new products from time to time (new degrees or certificate programs) or new services (online options, blended learning), we probably don’t look at our roles the same way an entrepreneur would.

Most of us work in established organizations. We probably don’t worry too much about finding the right audiences for our content. We have scores of them, and many of these audiences (alumni, current students, members of the community where our schools reside) already have a connection with our institutions.

But we should be thinking more strategically about who these people are.

I recently read about one approach that connects both audience and content in a pretty nifty way. It’s called audience-centric content strategy. It begins with the audience first.

Whether we call it “audience-centric” or by some other name, the important thing is to keep our audience in mind as we design our content strategy. Then maybe the most relevant aspects of our plentiful storehouses of content (the supply) will better connect with what our audience is looking for (demand).

‘The enemy of clarity’

freeimage-684383-webI got to tune in to the Chick-Fil-A Leadercast last Friday, thanks to the university I work for, which was a sponsor of the event. This annual event is broadcast at sites across the nation. This was the first time I was able to attend.

We heard from a lot of great speakers about leadership, and much of what I heard either inspired me or made me think more about ways I could be more effective as a leader. Those few hours on Friday have given me much to think about.

For me, the best takeaway of the day came from the first presenter: a minister named Andy Stanley.

He said:

Complexity is the enemy of clarity.

Those of us in the communications business know this, right? We learned from Strunk and White to “Omit needless words.” We try to break complex thoughts down into shorter, single-thought sentences. We strive for simplicity.

But as the work we do becomes more complex, it’s easy to lose sight of the need for clarity. It becomes shrouded by the fog of too many projects, too many priorities, too many new stakeholders to worry about, too many audiences to be reached with a single message or vehicle. (The typical higher ed home page is one example of how complex things can get in our world. Contrast the typical higher ed home page with Google’s, and the issue is very clear.)

Things may be even tougher for higher ed communicators than those in other fields. (Another speaker of the day, John C. Maxwell, pointed out that “Educators make the simple complex. Communicators make the complex simple.”) But judging from the buzzword-laden press releases that come from the corporate world, it looks like things are tough all over for communicators.

No matter what our sector is, complexity is the enemy of clarity.

But complexity is inevitable. It comes with growth.

Think about how you do your job these days. Now, compare it to five years ago. Consider the role social media plays in your marketing compared to its role in 2008. Look back 10, 20 years and you’ll see a tremendous difference. Remember your institution’s first web page?

Much has changed and grown more complex, hasn’t it.

Stanley said: “Growth creates complexity, which requires simplicity.”

The need for clarity has never been greater. We need more clarity in how we think, communicate, lead and work with others. We need to strip away all the complexity and figure out the clearest, best-understood approach to any project or task.

An experiment

Here’s an idea (stolen from Andy Stanley’s talk): Take a current project you’re involved in. The more complex, the better (for the purpose of this exercise). In the context of that project, try to answer these three questions:

  1. What are we doing?
  2. Why are we doing it?
  3. Where do I fit in?

If you’re really ambitious, try to answer the same three questions for your department, or your institution.

Those are three simple questions. But clearly, simple doesn’t mean easy. Answering them will take you quite a bit of think time. I’m still trying to answer them for my department, my university and myself.

P.S. – For anyone interested in reading more about what Andy Stanley, John C. Maxwell and all of the other speakers had to say, a consulting firm called The Malphurs Group has posted a great summary of all the Chick-Fil-A Leadercast 2013 presentations.

Photo © Chepatchet | Dreamstime Stock Photos & Stock Free Images