The edublogger economic stimulus package

Online College Edu Blogger Scholarship ContestNote: this is NOT my official entry into the College Edu Blogger Scholarship Contest, but I stuck the badge on this post merely to help direct people to the information. If you click, on the badge, you should know that it might give me an unfair advantage in the contest. I’m not sure, because I didn’t read the rules that closely. Anyway, click if you want to. Or not. I’ll compose my entry later.

If any of my fellow higher ed bloggers got into blogging because they thought it would be a lucrative gig, it didn’t take long for them to find out otherwise.

Even the A-list are discovering that the financial payoff for the hours they spend blogging just isn’t there. (Daniel Lyons, who attained blogfame as the Fake Steve Jobs, admitted that “while blogs can do many wonderful things, generating huge amounts of money isn’t one of them.”)

So it warms my jaded heart to see Karine Joly‘s announcement today that she, working with Online College and a couple of other higher ed bloggers, will give away a total of $2,500 in scholarships to some three lucky higher ed bloggers.

So while the rest of the world awaits U.S. President Barack Obama’s signature on the gargantuous stimulus package today, Karine Joly and Online College acted swiftly to bring the edublogger economic stimulus package to us.

OK, it really isn’t as easy as that. no trickle-down, everybody-gets-a-slice social engineering here. It’s all about competition and creativity, social Darwinism at its finest. There are rules and requirements. This is a scholarship, after all. Rather than try to explain all the rules in this space, I’ll just direct you to the OC site, where you can get the scoop. The contest is open until March 17 — St. Patrick’s Day — so get cracking and maybe you’ll find that mythical pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Good luck.

Economic recovery and higher education

If the stimulus package approved by Congress over the weekend is going to work, a good chunk of its success may depend on higher education.

Higher ed figures to play a prominent role in a long-term economic recovery under the provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act passed by Congress on Friday and expected to be signed into law by President Obama on Tuesday. In the short term, though, the stimulus will consist of infusions of money and tax breaks for individuals: more relief for the unemployed and uninsured, help for first-time home buyers, modest incentives for car purchasers, and some additional tax credits.

But beyond those measures, the stimulus package includes several items that relies on a stronger, longer-term partnership between colleges and universities and state and federal government. If handled wisely, they could help pave the way toward a transformation of our economy.

Last Friday, Inside Higher Ed‘s Doug Lederman analyzed how the economic stimulus package will affect higher education. It’s mostly good news, but public colleges are more likely to be happier with the end result than private institutions, Lederman points out.

Administrators at public colleges and officials in state higher education agencies were probably relieved that the compromise legislation would deliver a total of $53.6 billion in new aid to states over the next two years. … [T]he compromise figure is far higher than the $39 billion that was in the Senate version of the legislation, and $53.6 billion — $39.6 billion of which is designed to fill gaps left by state budget cuts, and $8.8 billion of which is set to go to governors to use for education and other purposes — should go a significant way toward softening the impact of the economic downturn on state colleges and universities.

University research should also benefit from the legislation, which “allots roughly $16 billion to several federal agencies for research grants and facilities over two years, most of which will eventually flow to academic institutions,” Lederman writes. The lion’s share of those funds will go to the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation and Department of Energy — three huge funding agencies that, working in partnership with colleges and universities, can help to focus research on areas of national need, like biotech, health and medicine, infrastructure, engineering and science education, and energy and environmental sustainability.

The increase in Pell Grant funding will also help make college more affordable for students, which in turn will lead to a more educated work force and upward mobility.

“If there was bad news in the final stimulus bill,” writes Lederman, “it was probably for officials at private nonprofit institutions.”

Their students will surely benefit from the increased Pell Grants and tax credits, but they had hoped that Congress would increase the limits on unsubsidized loans (as the House had planned to do), and they lost at the last minute nearly $60 million in new capital contributions to the Perkins Loan Program. They were also hardest hit by the Congressional negotiators’ decision to eliminate the separate pot of money ($6 billion in the House bill, $3.5 billion in the Senate) for higher education facilities, which was envisioned to be distributed by the higher education agency in each state.

The compromise stimulus bill wiped out those funds and up to $16 billion for school districts — reportedly in the face of opposition from Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, one of three Republicans whose votes the White House and Senate Democrats desperately needed in order to pass the legislation, which most GOP members oppose as too heavily tilted toward non-stimulative spending rather than tax cuts.

In the final analysis, much more needs to be done to nurse our economy back to health. The banking and investment system needs an overhaul. The automotive industry needs to be retooled, as do many other sectors of our economy in order to be positioned for a transition into a more environmentally sustainable economy. But education must play a role in these sectors, too. For our colleges and universities must provide the kind of holistic education that will prevent future mismanagement — of money, of talents, and of precious natural resources. We must do our part to ensure that “the smartest guys in the room” of our country’s major institutions are managing their resources wisely and ethically.