July 2011 – Page 3 – Andy writes!

With Wednesday’s public launch of Visual.ly, the site that lets people create infographics using web-based data, it didn’t take long for a co-worker to introduce me to Visual.ly’s tool to generate a visual representation of my Twitter persona. Mashable has more about Visual.ly, and you can check out scores of cool infographics by visiting the site itself.

Here, according to Visual.ly, is what my Twitter self looks like. It’s nice to know I’m almost 20 percent interesting and 15 percent enthusiastic. Consistent my Visual.ly avatar’s facial expression, I am unfazed by these revelations.

Based on the keyword data at the bottom, I’d call this more of a snapshot in time of recent Twitter use, rather than a comprehensive visual representation. But it’s still interesting and fun to see.

You can also use Visual.ly to compare yourself to other Twitter users, or to compare separate Twitter accounts.

Linking back to my recent Friday Five post about online influence measurement, here is a comparison of the two biggies: @Klout and @PeerIndex:

If you’re like most website readers, you focus your attention (what little you have) on the opening paragraph of text. So said Jakob Nielson more than five years ago.

You can just skip this paragraph and move on to the next one. If Nielson is right, you probably will anyway.

And then, according to Nielson, your eyes will track back to this paragraph. The eye tends to skim website text in an F pattern. “F for fast,” Nielson says. “That’s how users read your precious content.”

Heat maps show eye-tracking F patterns from Jakob Nielsens 2006 study. (Click image for link to Nielsons original article.) — Heat maps show eye-tracking 'F' patterns from Jakob Nielsen's 2006 study. (Click image for link to Nielson's original article.)

So why am I blogging today, in 2011, about usability research that is more than half a decade old? Because, thanks to this article in The Next Web, I was reminded of this research a couple of days ago. It never hurts for a verbose blogger to be reminded that readers don’t always hang on our every word.

More important, that TNW article made wonder if Nielsen’s findings still hold true in the content-streamed, microblogging world of Twitter, Facebook and Google+.

By now you’re probably done with this article. But hang on for just a minute and think about these questions:

Do our eyes still track that F shape in our new social media-saturated world? What about on mobile devices? What about tablets? Has technology changed the way our eyes traverse a screen?

Back in 2006, maybe your website did deserve an “F” (pattern). Does that still hold true today? I’d love to hear your thoughts.