Friday Five: Interview with ‘Brand Like A Rock Star’ author Steve Jones

brand like a rock starAs a music lover and marketer, I couldn’t wait to get my hands on Steve Jones’ new book Brand Like A Rock Star (affiliate link). I’m about halfway through the book, and it’s a great read so far.

The concept behind Brand Like A Rock Star is simple but brilliant. Jones, a veteran of the music marketing business (@rockstarbrands on Twitter), examines the reasons behind the success of some of the greatest acts in rock-and-roll history — from Bob Dylan and the Grateful Dead to KISS and AC/DC — and applies those lessons to the business of brand-building. As he says in the interview below, “it is a fun way to look at brands — education or otherwise — and bands.”

This Steve Jones...
This Steve Jones...
I asked Jones to share some of his thoughts about branding, the book and rock-and-roll with us. For more insight, you can check out his website (where you can download a free chapter of the book) and excellent blog.

1. You share a name with the Sex Pistols’ guitarist. Did your parents name you after that Steve Jones, or is that just a happy coincidence?

Steve Jones: I would love to think that my parents musical tastes were that progressive, but that simply wouldn’t be true!

...not this Steve Jones
...not this Steve Jones
I was also born in 1970, a few years before the Sex Pistols’ rise to fame. But even if I had been born at the height of the Sex Pistols’ fame, I doubt my parents would have known who Steve was. Their tastes were much more folk-oriented.

Frankly, I am surprised I wasn’t named after Gordon Lightfoot or Roger Whittaker or someone like that!

2. What inspired you to write this book?

Steve Jones: I’ve always been very interested in the human decision making process, and over the course of my 27 years in the radio industry I’ve studied it a great deal. Why does a listener choose one radio station over another, even though both are playing essentially the same songs? It comes down to branding. It comes down to an expectation.

Fast forward a few years, and I was sitting on a patio sipping a beer and listening to Jimmy Buffett and the thought crossed my mind that he had built up an incredible brand using only one hit song, “Margaritaville.” I began to think about other rock stars that did the same thing, like the Grateful Dead. And the concept was born! I immediately reserved the URL “Brand Like A Rock Star” and started blogging about the lessons that business can learn from rock and roll. Over the course of two years of blogging, the book evolved rather organically from there.

3. Of all the branding lessons in your book, which one do you think is the most important for marketers (of any or all sectors) to heed? And why?

Steve Jones: There are two really. One is “Sell The Experience” and the other is “Different Beats Better.”

The “experience” concept is simple… stop selling/marketing/promoting the products you sell, and start talking about the experience that customers have when they interact with you. Great brands spend most of their marketing time (and money) talking about the experience. Think about Apple… very very seldom do you see Apple ads that talk about price points or even product features. They are masterful at marketing the experience. My favorite example is the iPhone ad that uses two deaf people communicating via Facetime. Very powerful.

Different beats better
Different beats better
The “Different” concept is equally simple, yet seems to evade so many businesses. KISS proved it. You don’t need to strive to be dramatically better than the existing leader, you need to demonstrate that you are dramatically different.

After all, what constitutes “better” differs from person to person. We all have our own view of what a “better” product looks like. But most of us can agree on what is “different.” KISS was different when they came along, and you couldn’t help but to notice them. Lady Gaga does that today. You can’t avoid her. Are KISS and Lady Gaga the best examples of musical genius in our time? Probably not, to be fair. They are talented, but are they better than everyone else? On the other hand, nobody can dispute that they were both dramatically different.

4. Which takeaway from Brand Like a Rock Star do you think is most applicable to higher education?

Steve Jones: Avoid trying to be all things to all people, and build a brand that someone will hate.

I think the higher education institutions that position themselves as “general” are becoming invisible, just like any business that attempts to please everyone eventually does. The schools (and brands) of the future that stand the best chance of success are the ones that stand for something. And when you stand for something, you are going to inevitably have people who dislike what you stand for. Accept that. In fact, celebrate it! If I’m a history buff, I am probably not going to choose MIT. Yet there is no doubt that I probably have an opinion on MIT and an understanding of what they are all about.

So what is it that you do that is special and unique? What do you specialize in? What makes you different than everyone else? Find those answers and use them to build your reputation.

5. When you think of the most recognizable brands in higher education (i.e., the most recognizable colleges and universities), what comes to mind? And to which rock stars would you compare those brands?

Steve Jones: That’s a cool question, and not an easy one to answer. I think the higher education brands that come to mind are the schools that stand for something, as I mentioned above. If you wanted to draw some parallels between rock stars and recognizable colleges and universities, you could look to certain qualities and values.

For example, Ivy League schools like Harvard and Yale are like Bruce Springsteen… almost royal in their nature, among the very first to ever exist, and likely to maintain their legendary status for many years to come. Liberal schools like Williams College, Amherst, or Claremont are the Bob Dylans of education… leaning heavily on issues, rigorously academic but socially inclusive, and often progressive in their thinking. Schools like MIT and Stanford are like Rush… very nerdy, extremely intelligent, and uniquely and wonderfully complicated.

Although it is superficial, it is a fun way to look at brands — education or otherwise — and bands.

Bonus question (you know I have to ask this): What are the five albums you would take with you if you were stranded on a desert island?

Steve Jones: In no particular order… and with “greatest hits” albums excluded…

Exodus/Bob Marley
Nevermind/Nirvana
Born To Run/Bruce Springsteen
Revolver/Beatles
London Calling/The Clash

#highered web design: How far have we come?

At the tail end of 2010, Six Revisions founder Jacob Gube presented his four predictions for web design in 2011. So here we are, more than a year later, and I’m wondering how closely the advances in higher ed web design mirror Gube’s predictions.

So, I pose a question to readers of this blog — especially those who do web design in the higher ed space: How closely have changes in higher ed web design mirrored Gube’s predictions during the past year? I hope you’ll provide comment.

Here’s what Gube predicted for web design back on Dec. 30, 2010:

1. The mobile web will go mainstream. Even though mobile was a dominant topic of discussion among web designers in 2010, Gube wrote that “it’s still safe to say that most websites have given little to no attention to their mobile web presence.” Gube doesn’t have anything to say about the state of higher ed and mobile. Fortunately, we have Dave Olsen’s blog, Mobile in Higher Ed, as a resource for our sector. Last October, Dave compiled a nice list of college and university mobile websites. Does this listing indicate that higher ed is on the right track regarding mobile? Has the mobile web, in fact, gone mainstream in higher ed?

2. Web design as a profession will become specialized. “In the future,” Gube wrote, “there will be greater stratification of the role of web designer. Right now, web app designers, mobile app designers and traditional website designers are clustered under the umbrella title of ‘web designer.'” I think we’re seeing a bit of this in higher ed, but it seems that web positions are still broad-based and generic.

3. Simpler aesthetics for websites. “Web designers are forgoing complex visuals and overdone design techniques, opting instead for clean and simple web designs with a high attention to detail, a greater emphasis on typography … and stronger interaction design for richer and more captivating user experiences.” I’m not sure we’re seeing much simplification of websites in higher ed. What do you think?

4. Web design will replace print design (even more). “We’ll be witnessing design budgets earmarked toward traditionally print-based branding materials shift toward web design solutions such as Twitter profile page designs, Facebook fan page designs and HTML e-mail and e-newsletter template designs.” Maybe someday, but I don’t see it happening yet.

What are your thoughts about these predictions? Are they coming to pass in higher ed? Or are we still stuck in 2002?