Yes, marketers are weird. But what’s so bad about that?

© Paulprescott | <a href="http://www.stockfreeimages.com/">Stock Free Images</a> & <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/">Dreamstime Stock Photos</a>
© Paulprescott | Stock Free Images & Dreamstime Stock Photos

Last fall, Seth Godin released We Are All Weird, a book that celebrates the oddball individuality of humanity. In the blog post announcing the release of this book, Godin wrote, “During the age of mass (mass marketing, mass manufacturing, mass schooling, mass movements) the key was normal. Normal was important because you needed (were required) to fit into your slot. … But what happens when mass disappears? When we can connect everyone, customize and optimize — then what happens to normal?”

Godin adds that:

Normal is so ingrained in what we do every day that it’s difficult to notice that your tendency toward the normal is now obsolete.

So recently, when Guy Kawasaki posted an infographic comparing how marketing people use social media compared to the rest of the world, I thought again about Godin’s book, and about weirdness and the abnormal.

Clearly, when it comes to social media usage, marketing types are out of the mainstream. According to the infographic (created by SF Heat), we’ve flocked to  Twitter, Pinterest, Spotify and Instagram in greater proportion than the “normal” social media user. (Case in point: 53 percent of us are on Instagram, versus 6 percent of the “normals.”) The majority of us (63 percent) strongly agree that brands should be using social media more to connect with customers, while just 23 percent of the normals believe the same thing. Ninety-three percent of us marketing types follow brands on Twitter, compared to just 33 percent of the normal population.

We can look at these stats in a couple of ways:

  • We are spending far too much time focusing on social media as a tool to connect with customers; or
  • We are ahead of the curve, early adopters who are establishing outposts in new corners of the social media universe where the rest of the online world will eventually catch up with us

I think we need to be out of the mainstream in our experimentation with social media. But we also need to be mindful that many of those we hope to reach — among our customers, in our audiences — aren’t quite where we are yet, and may not catch up for a while, if ever. Leaders should lead, yes, but they  should not get so far ahead of their followers that they lose sight of them.

Besides, some of us marketers aren’t exactly on the vanguard, as a peek at my dormant Pinterest account would confirm.

Getting back to Seth Godin’s point, the Internet is where the weirdness takes root. He writes in We Are All Weird (excerpted here) that:

… [T]he Internet permit[s] a different sort of power, one of silos and smaller but tighter networks. Now, there’s an incentive to fragment instead of coalesce. And given the choice, given the chance to be weird, more and more of us are taking that chance.

Is there any doubt at all that we’re going to get weirder?

So, my fellow marketers, branding and PR types, enjoy your statistical outlier-ness while you can. The rest of the world will soon catch up. And it will be up to us to push help explore the next levels of weirdness, to lead the way for the others.

Why we do what we do

Lately I’ve been trying to make time to watch more TED talks as a way to glean inspiration or new ideas. I usually find at least one or two valuable takeaways from each 12- to 15-minute talk I view.

But sometimes I see a talk that reminds me of something I thought I already knew, but that in the busyness of life I had somehow forgotten.

That was the case with Life lessons from an ad man, an engaging, entertaining and enlightening TED talk by Rory Sutherland of the Ogilvy Group. (The entire video is embedded at the bottom of this post, and it’s worth the 16 minutes or so of your time to watch it, especially if you’re in the business of managing perceptions.)

Sutherland, an effective ad man, reminded me about why I do what I do in higher education. At the 2:55 mark of his talk, he puts higher ed branding, PR and marketing into perspective:

The point is that education doesn’t actually work by teaching you things. It actually works by giving you the impression that you’ve had a very good education, which gives you an insane sense of unwarranted self-confidence, which then makes you very, very successful in later life. …

But, actually, the point of placebo education is interesting. How many problems of life can be solved actually by tinkering with perception, rather than that tedious, hardworking and messy business of actually trying to change reality?

Sutherland is exaggerating, but he has a point.

Those of us who work in higher ed marketing, PR, branding and communications help people solve problems by tinkering with perception. We really do. The essence of building an institutional brand is to add intangible value to the reality that is a college education. And by doing so, we make the intangible tangible.

Making the intangible tangible. That’s what we do, on our best days. Or as Harry Beckwith said, brand-building, brand-managing and marketing is about Selling the Invisible. By doing so, we add value to that thing we sell: an education.

* * * * *

Here’s Sutherland’s talk. I encourage you to watch the whole thing.