Summit, interrupted

My good intentions of blogging about the Global Marketing Summit (see previous post) were tossed aside early Tuesday morning, when I got a call from the folks back at the office informing me that one of our students had been subdued by university police after the student had threatened to blow up a building on campus. (Here’s the latest.)

So I bagged the conference and headed back to Rolla to help with the crisis communications. (Not that I was needed. The UMR PR staff, aided by colleagues in our department who pitched in and folks from IT and elsewhere, did a great job. But i wanted to lend a hand with the aftermath and second-day, “campus back to normal” stories.) The past couple of days, I’ve been out of marketing mode and into crisis communications mode. It’ll probably take a while before I can switch gears and get back to the serious issues of marketing. But I’ll be back.

Blogging: bad for business?

Eight days ago, Dee Rambeau, a (now-former)* contributor to the MarCom Blog, announced that he was giving up blogging. “I am convinced after 3 years of blogging,” he writes in a post aimed mainly at PR students at Auburn, “that blogging is not a positive thing for business, rather it is a negative.”

He then presents his case: that “blogs are useless and irresponsible” for public corporations, that content management systems have improved to a point where they can provide most of the value-added aspects of customer relations blogs used to offer (“Set your website up to have the ability for you to make content additions/changes right away”), that blogging is more about ego than PR, and so on. He ends with good advice to PR students (and anyone else willing to heed it).

While blogging may be bad for business, from Rambeau’s perspective, does that make it bad for colleges and universities?

* Apparently, according to Robert French, the blogger behind Marcomblog, Rambeau will continue to post there on occasion. But he’s given up his businessy blog, Adventures in Business Communications.