Kent State’s measured response to the Ebola media frenzy

The Ebola media craze has finally reached higher education, and Kent State University in Kent, Ohio, is responding appropriately, without fueling the news and social media paranoia.

U.S. online media mentions of Ebola have increased dramatically since the first case of the virus was diagnosed in the U.S.
U.S. online media mentions of Ebola have increased dramatically since the first case of the virus was diagnosed in the U.S.

Earlier this week, media reports indicated that the second healthcare worker diagnosed with Ebola in Dallas, Texas, had recently visited Ohio and stayed with three Kent State employees, who are also the patient’s relatives. The patient is also a Kent State graduate. The university directed those three exposed employees to stay home, and a media frenzy ensued.

Kent State reacted swiftly to media speculation, posting a statement on the university website, holding a press conference and sharing updates on social media. Kent State President Beverly Warren has also used her Twitter account to communicate how the university is addressing the issue and speculation.

Tara Smith, a Kent State associate professor of epidemiology, posted her take on the situation at Kent State: Here’s What It Looks Like When Ebola Fear Comes to the Heartland. “When news broke, the university immediately commenced an ‘all hands on deck’ response,” she writes, adding that the response had been met with mixed reviews on campus.

From my distant perspective, I think Kent State is doing everything right. The response was swift yet measured. Social media is playing a critical role. Campus leaders are taking a proactive approach to communicating.

Still, the media attention continues.

“Unfortunately,” writes Smith, “the worst part of the situation has indeed been the news media. Radio stations suggested that Ebola would be spread far and wide around Kent and Cleveland, that the plane the patient flew on should have been nuked and never used again, baggage handlers at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport should be quarantined because ‘they may have touched her suitcase’ and that everyone was at risk, no matter how tenuous their connection to the area and the patient.”

The media attention may have a silver lining. A MediaMiser post from earlier this month suggests that the increased media attention “could be a good thing for overall efforts to fight the smouldering outbreak in West Africa.”

Aid organizations like the WHO and Doctors Without Borders have been pleading for the Western world’s attention towards the epidemic for months.

It seems they finally have it.

Yet a week or so since that post, U.S. media attention has shifted markedly from the crisis in Africa to the cases in the U.S. Even as Americans become more aware of Ebola, we are still confused about how the disease is transmitted.

For higher education institutions in the U.S. and elsewhere, we find ourselves with an opportunity to educate and communicate. With many international students studying on our campuses, we are targets of fearful U.S. citizens who may wonder whether students from other countries or professors returning from abroad might be carriers of the disease. We will need to communicate rationally about the potential concerns surrounding Ebola in our countries, how we are equipped to address the potential of exposure and what precautions we are taking to minimize risk. We also have the opportunity to help educate the public. We will have ample opportunity to do so, because this concern is not likely to go away any time soon.

Related: From The Chronicle of Higher Education: As Ebola Fears Touch Campuses, Officials Respond With an “Excess of Caution”.

Friday Five: Fiscal year faves

Blogger’s note: I know it’s only Thursday. But like many of my fellow Americans, I plan to put away the digital devices for much of the day in order to properly celebrate our nation’s independence.

An early Happy Independence Day to those of you in the U.S. A belated Happy Canada Day to our neighbors to the north. And a belated Happy Fiscal New Year to those of you in higher ed who live your lives by the July 1-June 30 fiscal cycle.

Today’s post is a round-up of my favorite blog posts from the past fiscal year. They may not necessarily be your favorites (judging from the site analytics, more of you visited my list of the best pop and rock albums of all time than you did some of the posts below; apparently you got wind of my exquisite taste in music) but I think they were pretty darn good pieces of writing that may be worth a second look. Plus, these sorts of retrospectives are an easy way to reuse existing content, and that’s what the content marketers and brand journalism experts tell us to do, right? So let’s get with it.

1. Boring old brand-building

I wrote this post nearly a year ago, based on an observation from an old book about branding. Both the book and the observation — that “Brand building is boring work” and “What works best is absolute consistency over an extended period of time” — remain relevant today. And should for as long as brands exist.

2. 3 branding game-changers and how #highered must adapt

This one was my interpretation of a September 2013 study by brand consultancies Wolff Olins and Flamingo (The New Mainstream: Creating a new relationship between people and brands). Here, I tried to show how these three branding game-changers apply to higher education. This post was also the most popular entry for FY14 in terms of visits.

3. Adventures in meme-jacking

Wow.

Very blog.

Much analytic.

Many April.

So Fools’.

Amaze.

My attempt to describe the short-lived but very fun social media sensation that was our university’s 2014 April Fools’ Day web joke.

4. Media relations in a disintermediated world

Heavy navel-gazing about the future of media relations. This led to a presentation delivered at a regional PRSA conference last month, and to a HigherEdLive.com conversation on the topic of disintermediation in university advancement the month before. I’ll probably be discussing disintermediation again in September at the Aggregate Conference in Louisville, Kentucky.

5. 5 proven, mind-blowing ways to get people to read your blog

You won’t believe what happens next.

Bonus link: Friday Five: Marketing lessons from the Beatles

Hey. I can’t hide my love away from this post about what marketing lessons we can learn from the Fab Four. This was posted on the eve of the 50-year anniversary of the Beatles’ first Ed Sullivan Show appearance.

Friday Five: @JimLukaszewski’s personal action plan from #PRSAMDC

Jim Lukaszewski (photo via www.prsamdc.com)
Jim Lukaszewski (photo via http://www.prsamdc.com)

I’m very glad I was able to attend a portion of the Public Relations Society of America’s 2014 PRSA Midwest District Conference in Springfield, Missouri, on Thursday. I’m especially happy that I was able to hear kickoff keynote speaker Jim Lukaszewski’s terrific presentation on gaining influence. Jim is head of the Lucaszewski group and a big name in the PR and crisis communications fields. He shared a lot of knowledge and great ideas with us today. But the best takeaway of Jim’s talk, for me, was his five-step personal action plan. (And wouldn’t you know it? Those five steps fit perfectly with this blog’s Friday Five format.)

Since Jim so graciously shared his wisdom with us, I don’t think he’d mind my freely passing it along to all of you. It’s a pretty good template that I think would apply to fields outside of PR, marketing, branding and strategic communications. So even if you’re not in the PR, marketing or branding business, you might find Jim’s plan adaptable to your vocation — and/or your life outside of work.

Jim Lukaszewski’s five-step personal action plan

  1. Broaden your interests. In the context of the PRSA conference, Jim asked us to “Broaden your interest beyond the media.” Our organizations’ leaders have broader interests. So should we.
  2. Teach yourself to ask these five questions at the end of every day:
    1. What do I know now that I didn’t know at the start of this day?
    2. What is the most important thing I’ve learned or witnessed today?
    3. What is the most interesting thing I’ve learned or witnessed today?
    4. Who did I help today (and how)?
    5. What new questions came up today that I need to find the answers to?
  3. Teach others. Along those lines, Jim also suggests we find compliment those who learn from us. Beyond that, we should strive to find someone to compliment and write that person a personal, handwritten note. He strives to do this three times per month.
  4. Study leadership. Read biographies or books about leaders who interest you, regardless of their field or discipline. But don’t limit your study to books. Study the leaders around you, including those in your organizations and in organizations you’re affiliated with (as a volunteer, for example).
  5. Do and say things that matter. Jim suggests we learn to moderate the suggestions we make to those who seek our counsel. We should keep our advice “simple, sensible, positive and constructive,” and make sure it helps our leaders achieve their objectives as well as the objectives of our organizations.

A good plan — for work and for life.

Follow Jim Lukaszewski on Twitter at @JimLukaszewki.

Making a spectacle of scientific research

In my 23-plus years in the higher ed PR and marketing business, I’ve had my share of encounters with university researchers that go something like this:

Me: Dr. So-and-so, I heard about your latest research project, and I think it would make a great story to share with the news media. Would you be willing to work with me on a release to share with some reporters?

Professor: I’m not interested in talking to the news media. They never get their facts right and they generalize everything.

Me (pondering the irony of a professor generalizing about the media’s tendency to generalize): Are you sure you don’t want to work with me on this? It’s a great story, and something that the public would be genuinely interested in.

Professor: No thank you.

And so I go on my way to the next potential research story to pitch to science news journalists.

Most researchers are not at all like the ones I describe above. (And of course I’m generalizing here to make a point.) But there are enough of them. And even some faculty who are willing to work with their university’s PR staff are skeptical about the news media’ ability to accurately convey the significance of their research in a series of short paragraphs or sound bites. This Ph.D. Comics cartoon about the science news cycle rings true to many of them.

The science news cycle, according to PhDComics.com
The science news cycle, according to PhDComics.com

So it’s with mixed feelings that I write about what seems to be two edges of the same media sword in today’s world.

One one edge, we have Neil deGrasse Tyson, a real live scientist (he’s an astrophysicist) and host of the TV series Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. He’s brought the 1980 Carl Sagan program of the same name into a new era, and is making science accessible to a broader audience than Sagan’s PBS series ever did. Over the past several weeks, millions of viewers of Fox (a company not always perceived as friendly toward scientific ideas like evolution and big bang cosmology) as well as National Geographic (a more science-friendly but less mainstream network) have tuned in to hear Tyson explain the mysteries of the universe.

On the other hand, we have two recent, high-profile stunts designed to showcase scientific advances. Both fell flat, for different reasons — and that raise the question of whether efforts to publicize scientific achievements are becoming too spectacular.

Wired reported on these two events on Friday. “It’s been a wacky week in science,” wrote Wired‘s Greg Miller. “First there was that computer that supposedly passed the Turing test, a 50-year old benchmark in artificial intelligence research. Then, yesterday (Thursday), a 29-year-old paralyzed man in a robotic exoskeleton took the opening kick in the World Cup in Brazil.

In both cases, the researchers behind the demonstrations have made grand claims about their importance as scientific breakthroughs. And in both cases critics have complained that they’re little more than publicity stunts. The Turing test chatbot didn’t look so great under closer scrutiny, and the long-awaited exoskeleton demo turned out to be a lot less dramatic than what was initially promised, at least judging by what was shown on TV.

All of which raises the question: Are spectacles like this bad for science? Or can taking science out of the lab and into the limelight serve a greater purpose?

Wired asked Hank Greely, a Stanford law professor who specializes in bioethics, to share his opinions on the matter. If you’re really interested in this topic, you should read the entire interview (it won’t take long). But the main takeaways for me are that:

1. Spectacles aren’t all bad. “When they attract public attention in a positive way, they can help build support for science in two ways. They can build political support among the masses, and they might spark some people to learn more or even go into science.” (Just be sure your science — or engineering — is working before you attempt the spectacular. I recall an incident in which a robot designed and built by students from the University of Pennsylvania was picked to throw out the first pitch of a Phillies game and fell short.)

2. Researchers need to share their stories. I agree with Greely here when he says: “In general I wish scientists paid more intention to communicating with the rest of world. Some of that is talking to journalists or serving as expert witnesses, and some of it is thinking up ways to publicize and dramatize the cool stuff you’re working on. Science needs to toot its own horn because it’s under threat.”

Our role, as PR and marketing professionals, is to help the researchers tell those stories. We just need to make sure we don’t make a spectacle of ourselves or our institutions in the process.

 

Friday Five: Good reads for #highered

Some recent-ish posts from the higher ed blogging community that I’ve enjoyed reading and thought were worth sharing:

  1. Pay more attention to the attention price you pay. This post by Karine Joly hits home on several levels and is well worth reading by anyone who is struggling with cognitive overload.
  2. Why are we still writing press releases? Tim Nekritz takes on the time-honored tradition of pelting media outlets with “news” they don’t care about and asks if there’s a better way.
  3. Startup U? That’s the question posed by Kyle James, in infographic form, on .eduGuru. Most thought-provoking to me is the idea that “universities that prepare students for a creative economy prioritize the same three things that drive successful startup cultures.”
  4. Why repositioning your brand is like pushing water uphill. Deb Maue of mStoner discusses the challenges of rebranding. “[W]hether you’re a shampoo or a college, brand repositioning is extremely difficult. Why? Because you’re not starting with a blank slate.” Her advice is for universities to “stop wishing they were someone else and embrace what they are.”
  5. How to spot good social media marketing research, by Chris Syme, provides some great tips and resources for finding good social media research products or embarking on your own research project.

Have a good weekend.