In other news: Anna Nicole Smith is still dead

Yeah, I know this is supposed to be a blog about marketing higher education. But sometimes I just can’t help myself and I have to veer off topic just a bit. Today’s post is a case in point.

In a post on Friday about the shame of American TV journalism, Jeff Jarvis of BuzzMachine points to a ThinkProgress video compilation of “some of the many, many lowlights” of how network and cable news networks covered the death of Anna Nicole Smith compared to coverage of other important stories, such as the war in Iraq.

The death of Anna Nicole Smith yesterday was a feeding frenzy for the national media, and coverage of the war was drowned out: NBC’s Nightly News devoted 14 seconds to Iraq compared to 3 minutes and 13 seconds to Anna Nicole. CNN referenced Anna Nicole 522% more frequently than it did Iraq. MSNBC was even worse — 708% more references to Anna Nicole than Iraq.

Watch it and weep. Or let the numbers tell the story:

References to Anna Nicole and Iraq on Cable Networks After 3PM ET:

NETWORK ANNA NICOLE IRAQ
CNN 141 27
FOX NEWS 112 33
MSNBC 170 24

Time Of Segments Devoted to Anna Nicole and Iraq on Broadcast Networks:

NETWORK ANNA NICOLE IRAQ
NBC 3:13 0:14
CBS 2:00 2:17
ABC 2:21 2:58

Online experts guides

In years past, a printed “experts guide” for reporters, editors and news directors was an indispensable tool for media relations folks. These days, an online experts guide is just as important. The SimpsonScarborough blog (my latest find in the world of edublogs) recently discussed the importance of online experts guides and shared some examples of online guides. Each of the four samples SS points to “are arranged quite differently, but each hits the mark in being simple, effective and near invaluable.”

Full disclosure: UMR recently retained SimpsonScarborough to conduct market research regarding our proposed name change.