Friday Five: blog of the beast edition

I was originally going to title this post “Friday five: of Twitter and teens, robots and brands.” Then I found out that today’s post is number 666 for this blog. Oooh. Scary. I thought about conjuring up some frightening doomsday posts, but in this economy, things are scary enough. Plus, I already had this stuff in the hopper, even before Thursday’s big Twitter/Facebook meltdown, which was apparently a huge denial-of-service attack aimed at bringing down one socially networked guy in the Republic of Georgia. Talk about overkill, scorched earth, using the atom bomb to kill a fly, etc.

Anyway, on to the five, which is just some interesting stuff I gleaned from the web, Twitter, etc., earlier in the week.

  1. Teens don’t tweet, eh? Earlier this week, Mashable reported that the percentage of the under-25 age group in the United States using Twitter is only 16 percent. This despite the fact that that age group makes up 25 percent of Internet users in the U.S., and everyone knows that that age group is the most tech-savvy of them al, or so goes conventional wisdoml. But what the Mashable story and the other headlines miss is the apparent healthy growth in the number of young tweeters since January (see chart; click it to enlarge). It looks like the better question may be, What is behind the apparent growth of twittering teens? (P.S. – When the news of this study broke on Wednesday, it became a trending topic on Twitter, and apparently plenty of the people tweeting about it were, in fact, the under-25 group.
  2. You’ve read the book. Now see the slidedeck. One of the essential elements of The Cluetrain Manifesto — a must-read book for anyone involved in online communications — is its 95 theses. Now they are available as a slideshow. (Thanks to @markgr for the link.)
  3. 10 Facebook marketing resources, via @EMGonline (Educational Marketing Group’s Twitter feed).
  4. Gah! Robots! They’re in Twitter! They’re on Facebook! Gahhh!
  5. A more social definition of brand. “For years I’ve thought of a brand as the image of a company in its customer’s mind. … [T]oday, thinking about the new corporate communications landscape, it struck me that a brand is more like the ongoing contact between company and customer.” A thoughtful and thought-provoking post from Engaging Experience (via @mStonerblog).

Have an enjoyable weekend. I’ll see you around on Twitter or possibly Facebook — unless they get hit again. If so, then maybe on the blogosphere. They can’t get every blog, can they?

BlueFuego research shows campuses integrating social and traditional web

If you sensed a trend that more and more campuses were jumping on the social networking bandwagon, some recent research by BlueFuego will confirm your suspicions.

BlueFuego (Brad J. Ward and Joe Gaylor) wanted to find out what colleges and universities were using social web “callouts” (those invitations to “Friend us on Facebook,” “follow us on Twitter” or “stalk us on MySpace” that you find on many school sites these days, or just the icons for various social media sites).

BF looked at the websites of 1,387 four-year colleges and universities, focusing on these campuses’ use of callouts on the institution’s homepage, main admissions site and main alumni site. Comparing the numbers of callouts from March 1 to August 1, BF recorded a doubling in the number across all three categories.

Brad and Joe pulled together a lot of great data (click through their slidedeck or see their own thumbnail analysis for more detail) but the key takeaway for me is that yes, there is a move afoot among colleges and universities to connect their institutional sites with the popular existing social media platforms. This sort of cross-pollenization is a good thing for campuses, because it indicates an effort to reach out beyond our own institutional sites and to connect with audiences on different turf.

It will be interesting to see how the social web callout trend goes in another six months, and what other research related to these observations BlueFuego will share with us next.