Job opportunity at Missouri S&T

If you’re interested in working in a dynamic, sometimes stressful, often fun, communications department of a technological research university, then have I got a deal for you.

I’m currently searching for an assistant director of communications to help us move forward as we make the transition from the University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR) to Missouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T). The communications department coordinates all PR, marketing and branding for the campus, in consultation with several other internal groups.

From my perspective, the ideal candidate will be someone who can manage the processes, work flow and staffing allocation for projects that involve small teams of staff across disciplines (i.e., graphic designers, writers and editors, and web designers/coders together). We need someone who can invigorate and inspire as well as “manage” people and processes. Although we’re a small enough team, with enough collaboration, that we don’t require a lot of managing.

The person doesn’t necessarily have to have a higher ed background. At this point, I’m leaving options open so we can get as large a pool as possible.

Interested? Drop me a line (andrew DOT careaga AT gmail DOT com) or log on to UMR’s Employment Opportunities site to register and search for the job.

Recommended reading for tech-savvy PR

Thanks again to all who responded to my call for books that might benefit PR folks interested in learning more about how public relations might function in the emerging social web. I’m going to share your recommendations with participants in Academic Impressions’ Advanced PR Institute, which begins tomorrow, in addition to the four books suggested by my co-presenters and me.

Here are your contributions to the list:

Kevin Guidry suggests we consider portions of Yochai Benkler‘s book, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (wiki | PDF version of the book). “It’s a hefty tome,” Kevin writes, “but it’s a tour de force of the impact of the Internet on…everything.” Kevin also mentions James Suriowiecki’s The Wisdom of Crowds as a possibility.

Colin Fast offers two recommendations:

1. The New Rules of Marketing & PR, by David Meerman Scott. “Picked it up recently based on positive reviews from many of the 2.0 folks I follow. Still reading, but I’ve already picked up a few useful bits of advice. It’s very tactical, which might provide some balance to the more theoretical books on the list.”

2. Citizen Marketers: When People Are the Message, by Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba (better known, perhaps, for their Church of the Customer blog). “This is a great introduction to the world of social media. Would probably be better as part of a remedial reading list for those who haven’t already been playing in this space.”

Judy Gombita seconds our recommendation of Wikinomics, mentions Chris Anderson‘s The Long Tail and We Are Smarter Than Me, another book on crowdsourcing/peering.

Boyd Neil suggests a couple of older books: Connected Intelligence, by Derrick De Kerckhove, and Steven Johnson’s Interface Culture. He also recommends any of Lawrence Lessig‘s books, and I would have to agree.

Heather Yaxley suggests that, rather than talk about books, we “have a ‘speed-dating’ style list of blog posts to visit and ideally, engage with.” Interesting.

Lois Kelly also endorses the David Meerman Scott book as “especially pragmatic” and suggests Paul Gillin’s The New Influencers.

Karen Miller Russell, who teaches PR at the University of Georgia, notes that she’s using The Long Tail and The New Rules of Marketing and PR in her class next semester. But I’m also including a couple of chapters from Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur, to provoke some discussion.

Gary Schlee
adds his support for The New Rules…

Abigail Hunter gets the last word: “But does anyone think it strange that in this day of incredible technology, we are still reading BOOKS written on PAPER? Are we not ignoring the technology we are trying to exploit? The greatest info I have received, BY FAR, on promoting my online ventures has come to me online. It’s the most up-to-date, and the ability to contact the author (and get a reply!) is far greater. I came across James Brausch (www.jamesbrausch.com) which gave me more info than any of the above books – simply because it’s always up-to-the-minute and focused on what I’m trying to do.”

* * *

OK. I’m off to Austin for the conference. I’ll blog or tweet from Austin when I can. Until then, be safe.

—————-
Now playing: Various Artists – Shoulda Oughta – Tim Barry
via FoxyTunes

Let’s blame marketing for PR’s rep slippage

The folks at PR Conversations are talking about how marketing is eroding public relation’s reputation. Poster Heather Yaxley establishes the premise this way:

Can we blame PR’s poor reputation on an increased focus on promotional communications for competitive differentiation (the reductionist view of PR as solely a subset of marketing)?

As a tactical function, PR is reduced to generating “free advertising”. That means evaluation ranges from calculating advertising value equivalent (AVE) to demands to prove return on investment in terms of sales generated from media coverage.

At the other end, those championing PR as a strategic management function seek to distance themselves from the press agents. But in doing so, aren’t they ignoring PR’s proven ability to achieve marketing objectives, either alone or as part of an integrated approach?

I’m not sure PR folks can blame marketing entirely, or that PR ever needed marketing’s help to sully our rep. But it’s making for some interesting commentary.

Part of the problem for PR practitioners, methinks, has to do with the fact that many of them come to the business from journalism. Since many journalists — not all, but many — enter the craft with a moralistic sense that they are on a crusade to speak truth to power, when they enter the PR side, they experience some cognitive dissonance. They (we) still want to present the truth, but now they’re doing so from a different perspective: as representatives of organizations or institutions that may not share those same moralistic values that drove the PR person toward a journalism career in the first place.

Maybe PR folks should just get used to the fact that we’re in the marketing business.

After all, how many times do you hear marketing people complain that PR is tainting their image?

—————-
Now playing: Bruce Springsteen – Radio Nowhere
via FoxyTunes

Mac’s new TV ad perpetuates PR stereotypes

No wonder public relations gets such a bad rap. Even PR’s comrades in marketing, the ad folks, are presenting PR in a negative light and perpetuating the slick spin-doc stereotype.

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/fAdAq98nb_o" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

I’m referring, of course, to Apple’s latest Mac vs. PC TV ad. The one I saw last night features a PR spokeswoman for the PC guy (John Hodgman) who tries to put a positive spin on the problems with Microsoft’s Vista operating system. It’s one of three new Mac vs. PC ads Apple has rolled out recently, and as Digital Journal reports, the new ads are more mean-spirited than previous ones.

I haven’t seen the other two ads — only the “PR Lady” piece — so I’m not qualified to comment. But it isn’t the mean-spiritedness that I mind as much as it is the way fellow marketers are perpetuating the corporate PR stereotype. For instance, as Digital Journal reports, “When PC admits how many users have gone back to XP after facing challenges with Vista, the PR rep says: ‘By downgrading he means they’re upgrading to an older, more familiar experience.'”

Besides, what PR person ever says “No comment”? Again, another stereotype.

It seems the new PR Lady ad might say more about the state of corporate ad agencies today than the PR business.

—————-
Now playing: Albert King – Can’t You See What You’re Doing To Me
via FoxyTunes