On August 15, don’t forget ed

This Wednesday, Aug. 15, the College Board‘s campaign to draw attention to higher education, Don’t Forget Ed, kicks into high gear.

The timing is not coincidental. The start of the fall semester just around the corner, and so are the national conventions of the two major political parties. And the goal of the “Don’t Forget Ed” campaign is to get both presidential candidates to pay attention to education.

Getting politicians to pay attention to education may sound simple, but it’s actually a pretty ambitious goal, given everything else on the national agenda. So that’s why the Don’t Forget Ed campaign needs our help.

What can you do? For starters, watch the video (also embedded below). Then go to the website to learn more about how you can help. Then, add your voice to the cause. Finally, on Aug. 15, join in on the Don’t Forget Ed social media rally on Twitter and Facebook. Follow @DontForgetEd on Twitter and use the #dontforgeted hashtag to spread the word about this effort. Let’s show our presidential candidates — and the world — just how the #highered community can rally. If we did it to help some of our own win a cross-country tweetrace, then surely we can band together for the future of education in our nation, right?

Just thought I’d share…

For some people, oversharing is jut a part of social media. But as this article and infographic from Online-Education.net reveals, oversharing can be dangerous, as well as just plain annoying.

Just thought I’d share. Forgive me if it’s TMI.

(Hat tip to Mashable for sharing this gem. It was just the right amount of info.)

On Facebook, ‘touchy-feely’ is out of touch

The findings or a recent study on how brands use Facebook should cause all of us in higher ed to rethink how we use the social media giant for our marketing efforts.

The study, conducted by Facebook itself and recently reported in Ad Age, suggests that the “touchy-feely” approaches many brands (including higher ed brands) take on Facebook aren’t all that effective. (Thanks to Inigral’s Brandon Croke for sharing that Ad Age article via Twitter.) Analyzing 1,200 posts from 23 different brands, Facebook’s researchers found that for those brands, getting a lot of “likes” or comments on posts may be less effective than Facebook “shares,” which redistribute a brand’s post into users’ timelines and is viewable by all of their Facebook pals.

“Compared with likes, shares represent a bigger investment from the consumer and occur less frequently,” writes Ad Age’s Matt Creamer. “Thus, shares are often going to be more meaningful from a marketing perspective. After all, they suggest the brand is tapping into that friend-of-fan network that’s central to Facebook’s viral proposition.”

Good point. Not that there’s anything wrong with getting a thumbs up on your Facebook post, but that like is little more than a simple nod of approval from someone who is already connected to your brand. Wouldn’t you rather have members of your Facebook community avidly share your posts with their own networks. This moves people into more of a brand ambassador role, sharing information from your organization with others who may then choose to get on board with you.

But whether you’re talking about likes, comments or shares, the best brands share information that is relative to the brand as well as to their Facebook community, Sean Bruich, head of measurement platforms and standards at Facebook, told Ad Age.

“By far, the biggest predictor of engagement was that the post was on a topic relevant to the brand,” said Bruich. “It impacts everything, from lightweight likes to more invested shares. It’s actually one of the most important things a brand can do. People are seeing the content because they liked the brand, and it makes sense that content about the brand will get them engaged.”

On a related topic, Brandon Croke’s recent blog post, What Prospective Students Think About Your Facebook Page, is worth a read.

Image via birgirking on Flickr/Creative Commons: http://www.flickr.com/photos/birgerking/5600215736/

Friday Five: To-do list edition

If there’s ever a day of the week where I can eke out a little bit of time to catch up on all those important-but-not-urgent, quadrant 2 activities, it is usually Friday. Alas, not this week. Too many meetings and deadlines.

But just in case you’ve got free time on your hands and are looking for some things to do, here are five:

1. Complete Karine Joly’s social media and web analytics survey. If you complete the survey, you’ll receive an executive summary. But do it now. The survey closes on April 18.

2. Learn about Facebook Groups for Schools. It’s the latest curveball Facebook has thrown at us. And just when we were finally figuring out the timeline. Mashable provides a little more context. Meanwhile, I’m waiting for one of our highered social media ninjas to give us the lowdown on how this will all work. Any takers? Update: Georgy Cohen shares in the comments below that Ma’ayan Plaut of Oberlin wrote about her web team’s experience as beta testers for the groups. So, we have our higher ed ninja after all — and a beta-testing ninja at that.

3. Prep for your next face-to-face meeting with this nifty body language decoder infographic from Lifehacker. Thanks to Debra Sanborn for the tip.

4. Check out the top 100 branding experts to follow on Twitter, according to Evan Carmichael.

5. Get creative this weekend with one of these nine easy ways to generate creative ideas.

Enjoy your weekend.

My so-called social media life

The unexamined life is not worth living. – Socrates

During the month of February, I tried to curtail my personal social media activity. As I explained in my previous post (some 32 days ago), I wanted to back off on my personal use of social media for an entire month — mainly just to see if I could.

I deliberately chose the shortest month of the year for my experiment. But 2012 being a leap year, February was a day longer than usual. So I took that into consideration as I launched this personal challenge. I also understood from conventional wisdom that it takes 21 days to change a habit, and I had become a habitual social media user. So I figured 29 days without social media would result in a new perspective, if not a new habit.

Now, I didn’t forsake social media entirely during February. I couldn’t. As one of the social media administrators for our campus, it’s part of my job to manage and monitor our university’s social media presence. But I tried my best to whittle down my time spent on personal social media.

I disappeared completely from Foursquare, and lost several mayorships as a result.

I virtually vanished from GetGlue, checking in only for the Super Bowl during February.

I declared a Facebook-free February but had to break it to post a “Happy Birthday” on my brother’s wall and to share that I was about to see Peter Frampton in concert on Feb. 27. I also posted some photos on Instagram that evening. (Even I cannot resist an occasional social media humblebrag.)

I didn’t blog. Also, I didn’t visit any higher ed blogs.

I didn’t ask or answer any questions on Quora. Which was no problem, since I never go there.

I am not on Path, Pinterest or any of the new next big social media sites, so I had no problem avoiding them.

Same with Google+.

My biggest hangup was with Twitter, my go-to social media milieu. I peeked in on Twitter more than any other site. But as you can see from the Twitter Counter graph below, my activity during the past month was far, far less than my usual.

Andrew Careaga on Twitter Counter.com

Interestingly, the number of followers didn’t take that great of a hit during my semi-hiatus from Twitter. It did bottom out during the middle of the month, but is now climbing back toward the level of late January.

Andrew Careaga on Twitter Counter.com

But what does it all mean?

A few people have asked me how this curtailment has affected me and my relationship with social media. Others have asked what lessons have I learned from this experiment. I don’t have any grand revelations to share. After all, I didn’t retreat to a mountaintop to seek enlightenment for a month. I just stopped doing certain things. Anyway, here are a few observations about my low-social media diet.

Out of the #highered loop, but not too worried about it. During my curtailment, I did feel like I was no longer in the know about the latest conversations in the higher ed social media sphere. Since I wasn’t checking Twitter much, and not reading higher ed blogs, I was essentially disconnected from my higher ed learning network.

I did receive occasional email notes from higher ed acquaintances sharing a link to something they thought would be of interest to me. Also, I continued to receive valuable e-newsletters focused on social media topics, and they tempted me with their links to current posts from the higher ed blogosphere. Karine Joly‘s weekly update always includes interesting and useful links, and every week I was tempted to click on a link or two. But for the sake of my experiment, I refrained. I feared falling down the social media rabbit hole. But I also wanted to see just how far behind I might fall in terms of my understanding of what’s new and current in higher ed. At the end of the experiment, I don’t think I missed much.

Missed opportunities to contribute, but my life is no worse for it. For such a short month, February is chock full of events that provide social media users with plenty of opportunities to become a part of something large and grandiose. Usually, these are entertainment events, like the Super Bowl, the Grammys and the Oscars. As would any sophisticated marketing operation, the organizations behind each of these events incorporated social media into their promotions and the events themselves. Super Bowl XLVI’s Social Media Command Center was perhaps the most extensive and heavily promoted of these efforts to integrate social media into the global hive of big televised events.

Anyway, I missed out on all of it. I tweeted briefly about the Super Bowl just prior to kickoff, but that was it. Instead I watched the Super Bowl on one screen this year, not two. As for the Grammys and the Oscars, I watched neither. Being oblivious to the stream of social media posts seems to have had no adverse affect on me.

I did kind of miss the February Pancake Tweetup, but it didn’t occur to me that I’d missed it until the month was nearly over.

Not the first to know. When Michael Jackson and Amy Winehouse died, I was one of the first to know because of Twitter. When Whitney Houston died, I found out a news crawler across my TV screen. I pulled out my phone to check Twitter, just to see how far behind the news on TV was compared to the news on Twitter. Many of my followers had already posted #RIPWhitneyHouston tweets — minutes before I even knew she was dead. So, instead of being one of the first to know about a breaking news event, I was one of the masses who learned about it minutes later. I’m not sure it matters, though.

A new sense of freedom. I’m not saying life got any less hectic because of my social media curtailment. I still had a lot of projects going on, at work, home, church, etc. But knowing that I had committed myself to not checking my social media streams, and not blogging, filled me a sense of liberation I haven’t felt in quite some time.

It soon dawned on me that, before going on my social media diet, I had created a self-imposed sense of obligation. I somehow felt that I had to blog, had to post on Twitter, had to wish my Facebook contacts a happy birthday. But no one had imposed these requirements upon me. I imposed them on myself. I could just as easily remove them. Once I got over the sense that I had to do something with social media, I found I could focus better on other, more important projects.

A social media housecleaning is good for the soul. Now that I’ve gone a month without using certain social media sites, I really don’t care if I ever use them again. I feel like I’ve done a bit of social media housecleaning. I lost five or six Foursquare mayorships during February. But who cares? Not me. I doubt I’ll become active with Foursquare again. Same with GetGlue. My check-ins on those sites now seems like a mindless and vain distraction. Who needs more mindless, vain distractions in their lives?

Some social media, I can probably never give up. I already mentioned that I found it tough to disengage from Twitter. I probably couldn’t completely shut down my Facebook presence, either, but for different reasons. Twitter is where I connect with people of like interests and professionals in higher ed. Facebook is a place where I tend to keep loose but important ties with family and old friends.

I think my habits have changed. It remains to be seen how much this monthlong experiment has affected my long-term social media habits. But I think I’ve changed. I don’t think I feel the same sense of obligation toward social media as I did before the fast. Then again, by this time next week I could be so heavily sucked into the social media vortex that I’m pinning stuff on Pinterest.

I beg of you, please don’t send me an invitation to join.